Liquor Control Board gets caught in its own web during compliance checks

The big story in Washington wine earlier this month was eight Walla Walla wineries cited by the state Liquor Control Board for selling alcohol to minors. By the end of last week details had emerged that the Liquor Control Board had erringly allowed minors to be in possession of alcohol for an extended period during the compliance checks. Charges against three of the eight wineries were subsequently reduced to a written warning due to the error.

Our story begins with a message dated January 21st from LCB Captain Jennifer Dzubay informing wineries that compliance checks would be coming in the next two months. The message stated, “All compliance checks will be conducted with a youthful appearing minor operative, ages 18 to 20 years of age, using their valid WA state drivers license.” The message also included a link to a video on responsible liquor sales. This warning is, I should note, generous on the part of the LCB. Imagine a police officer emailing you and saying “By the way, just wanted to let you know that I’m setting up speed traps on I5 this morning!” Wineries ignore messages from the LCB at their own peril.

During subsequent compliance checks in Walla Walla, 8 of 14 wineries were cited for selling alcohol to a minor (the compliance rate statewide was said to be an uninspiring 76%). However, in three of these cases, the minors involved entered the establishments with previously purchased liquor in hand.

One person working at one of the businesses involved, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, stated that a young couple entered the tasting room during the afternoon. After initially planning to ask for identification, he noticed that they were carrying a bottle of wine from a nearby winery and decided not to ask for ID. He subsequently sold the couple a bottle of wine. Shortly thereafter an LCB agent arrived and issued a citation. The person said of the LCB officer, “He writes me the ticket, and I ask him how it is legal for a minor to be in possession of alcohol and used as a prop in the sting. He was unable to give me a direct response.”

According to the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin (Note: Requires subscription) the protocol during compliance checks is for the minors involved to bring the purchased alcohol directly to an LCB agent who subsequently issues a citation. This failed to occur in this case as the minors visited multiple establishments in close proximity.

After details of the compliance checks emerged (see a story in the Tri-City Herald here and a post by Paul Gregutt here; the story was also picked up by the Associated Press), a backlash ensued with some stating that allowing minors to bring alcohol into an establishment was deceptive. (I would agree but to use the old X-Files adage, ‘Trust No One!’) After a review, the LCB subsequently reduced the citations against the three wineries where this occurred to warnings.

Make no mistake. Selling alcohol to minors is a serious issue and checking for compliance is one of the LCB’s mandates. However, allowing minors to be in possession of alcohol subsequent to the compliance checks is also a serious mistake. Isn’t keeping alcohol out of the hands of minors the entire purpose of these checks? By allowing this mistake to occur the LCB both damaged its own reputation and potentially the reputations of the wineries in question. Let’s hope none of these wineries are in a litigious mood.

Surely this is a ‘teachable moment’ for all involved. While the LCB should be commended for realizing a significant error occurred, reducing the charges was realistically the least it could do. Lest it look hypocritical, the warnings should be dropped as well.

Sean P. Sullivan


  1. Good job Sean, as always. Now to stop the insanity ahead of time, just in case you get enthusiastic readers wanting to lecture the wineries of Walla Walla (Believe me the Walla Walla haters of Walla walla wine ran rampant through Facebook regarding the same posts, and like parrots, the majority posted, "The law says you are suppose to card everyone ...") The law does not say purveyors of alcohol must card everyone.

    Here is what the WSLCB says and each individual company will set a policy on asking for ID.

    The crazy thing is that if you have a few years behind the tasting room bar, you begin to understand patterns and one of those patterns is that generally you rarely see the underage trying to buy wine. First of all: it is expensive. Beer at the local 7/11 is cheaper and easier to obtain. Second: The underage is looking for quanity and not quality. In quanity you cannot mix a good bottle of wine in a spodie and it expect it to taste decent like you can a cheap bottle of vodka.Typically? Chances are pretty great the only underage people we see in these businesses are those the WSLCB has sent in. Cheers!

  2. Alas, the wslcb, change is slow! Coming soon there next sting! Grocery store tasting, now they are only allowed to pour 4-1oz. tastes but now the mior in question will be a 2 year old in a grocery cart with the soccer mom sampling wine! Shame on us introducing the evils of alcohol to babies! See the kids cant come near the sampling venue.......and on and on wslcb

  3. I just took my MAST class last night. The statistics are staggering on underage drinking involving wine. 1%!
    So why are they investing tax dollars to harrass wineries.. Its clear its simply for revenue. Their tactics go way beyond entrapment to achieve their goal. All charges should be dropped and a clear message sent to LCB. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."

  4. This situation involved mistakes yes... The tactics to achieve their goal is what's questionable. Obviously a level of education should be stepped up for miseries and LCB. Shouldn't they been working with wineries rather than against them. Don't they help pay for their jobs?
    All wineries should protest for future protection against this clear harassment!

  5. This sting was unfair and below the belt. These wineries are trying hard to succeed. They are small generating little production. Why would they risk anything for an under age they would NOT.

  6. Agree with Catie and all of the above. Who's under age that goes wine tasting?? This was a witch hunt for money. The LCB should be ashamed.

  7. This also goes to that other topic and there great phone survey on there lcb stores before the holidays! Survey so full of holes! horrible waste of our tax dollars


Your comment will be published after it has been moderated.